TECHNICAL PROGRAMME | Energy Technologies – Future Pathways
Beyond establishing baseline CI values, this study constructs cargo-level decarbonization cost curves, quantifying the incremental cost (USD/boe) associated with varying levels of decarbonization (up to 100%). Mitigation strategies assessed include flaring reduction, methane management, operational electrification, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). The analysis specifically addresses compatibility with voluntary carbon market (VCM) eligibility criteria, assessing alignment with international standards including ISO 14040/67 [4, 5], and identifies gaps within current VCM protocols. Consequently, best-practice guidelines for conducting petroleum LCAs within a low-carbon trading framework are proposed.
This research aims to provide exporters, buyers, and policymakers with actionable insights into credible low-carbon cargo branding and pricing, particularly in anticipation of European carbon border adjustment mechanisms. By elucidating both carbon intensity metrics and the economic feasibility of decarbonization measures, the findings support the Middle East region's strategic transition toward sustainable export practices and proactive engagement in the global low-carbon energy economy.
References
- Energy Institute. Statistical Review of World Energy 2024.
- El-Houjeiri, H. M., Brandt, A. R., & Duffy, J. E. (2013). Oil Production Greenhouse gas Emissions Estimator (OPGEE): bottom-up LCA tool. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11), 5998-6006.
- Rystad Energy. UCube Database, 2024.
- ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework.
- ISO 14067:2018 - Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products.
The analysis first delineates the “well–gathering station–processing plant–pipeline network” system boundary. An LCA model constructed in SimaPro quantifies Global Warming Potential (GWP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential for Elements (ADPE). These metrics are paired with an LCCA-based economic appraisal to devise phase-specific optimisation strategies for construction, operation and decommissioning. An "Environmental-Cost-Technical" multi-objective decision model is then established. Subjective weights are obtained with the Triangular Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TFAHP); objective weights are derived with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method; and composite weights are calculated by minimum-deviation estimation. The Multiple-Attribute Boundary Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method is finally used to rank alternative surface-engineering schemes.
Applying the framework to the Sulige gas field shows that the optimal configuration is “downhole throttling, multi-well manifolding, wet-gas transmission, two-stage compression, centralised processing”. During construction, integrated skid-mounted equipment cuts GWP key-factor emissions by 6.8% and HTP risk by 22.5%; in operation, green-power drives and VOC recovery reduce GWP key-factor emissions by 27.4%, HTP risk by 31.9% and ADPE consumption by 9.5%; at decommissioning, a standard steel-recycling system achieves an 80% steel recovery rate.
By quantifying environmental and economic impacts through coupled LCA-LCCA and embedding them in a fuzzy MCDA framework that addresses life-cycle cost and technical feasibility, this study offers a replicable pathway for the sustainable development of surface facilities in tight gas fields.
Co-author/s:
Ruoqi Tan, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Jiaming Yu, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Guotao Fan, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Rui Zhang, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Zhenfang Xu, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
CORSIA specifies that SAF must deliver a minimum 10% net reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions relative to the baseline fossil jet fuel benchmark of 89 gCO₂e/MJ. Additionally, eligible feedstocks must meet stringent criteria related to land use, water and soil health, biodiversity conservation, human rights, and waste management. A key differentiator is the indirect land-use change (ILUC) risk, which assigns higher penalties to crop-based feedstocks like CPO and zero penalties to waste or residue-based alternatives such as Used Cooking Oil (UCO) and Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME).
The analysis compares CPO, UCO, and POME across life-cycle emissions and policy acceptance. UCO and POME, classified as waste/by-product streams, achieve significant GHG reductions—over 80%—and are free from ILUC implications, making them highly compatible with CORSIA and other international sustainability frameworks. In contrast, CPO-based SAF presents substantial challenges. Even with advanced biogas capture during processing (>85%), CPO achieves only marginal GHG savings (~14%). Without such mitigation, it fails to meet the minimum emissions threshold, disqualifying it under most standards.
These sustainability limitations are echoed in global policy frameworks. The European Union’s ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation and the United Kingdom’s SAF Mandate explicitly exclude CPO due to its high ILUC risk, while promoting UCO and POME as preferred feedstocks. Similarly, under the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and Clean Fuel Production Credit (CFPC) scheme, CPO is effectively ineligible, whereas UCO and POME qualify for financial incentives and SAF certification pathways.
This evaluation highlights that SAF derived from CPO is largely misaligned with international sustainability and regulatory expectations. The findings underscore that future SAF production strategies—particularly those seeking global recognition and market access—must prioritize waste and residue-based feedstocks such as UCO and POME over primary crop-based oils like CPO. For NRL’s proposed facility, aligning with such criteria will be critical to achieving CORSIA certification and international competitiveness in the growing SAF market.
Through a mixed-methods approach—including case studies, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis—the research identifies systemic inefficiencies in current waste management systems. For instance, BRICS nations exhibit alarmingly low recycling rates (e.g., 1–8% for construction waste), with most materials ending up in landfills or illegally dumped. Challenges such as inadequate regulatory frameworks, outdated technologies, and fragmented stakeholder collaboration hinder progress toward circularity. The paper proposes a Circular Economy Process Model (CEPM) tailored to oil and gas construction, emphasizing lifecycle integration, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive policies. Key strategies include adopting modular design, promoting recycled materials in infrastructure, incentivizing waste-to-energy technologies, and strengthening institutional frameworks for waste valorization.
Theoretical contributions highlight the integration of systems theory, life cycle assessment (LCA), and industrial ecology to reframe construction practices. Practically, the study offers actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, such as implementing circular procurement policies, advancing digital tools for waste tracking, and fostering cross-sector partnerships. Future applications of the CEPM could extend to other resource-intensive industries, supporting global sustainability goals.
By bridging the gap between developed and emerging economies, this research underscores the urgency of transitioning to circular practices in oil and gas construction. It provides a roadmap for reducing environmental footprints, optimizing resource use, and aligning the sector with international sustainability targets, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ultimately, the study advocates for systemic innovation, policy coherence, and stakeholder-driven governance to achieve a resilient, low-carbon, and circular construction ecosystem in emerging markets.
Keywords: Circular economy; Construction waste management; Oil and gas projects; Sustainability; BRICS nations; Lifecycle assessment; Policy innovation.
Co-author/s:
Wei Fan, Senior Engineer, CNPC Research Institute of Safety& Environment Technology.
Xu Zhang, Senior Engineer, CNPC Research Institute of Safety& Environment Technology.
The initial Global Warming Potential (GWP) is calculated at 6.11 kg CO₂-eq per liter of bioethanol, accounting for emissions from agriculture to biorefinery (cradle-to-gate). By applying allocation and system expansion methods, including reductions from avoided farm fires and petrol production displacement, the GWP decreases to 1.59 kg CO₂-eq per liter. Further, substituting bioethanol for petrol in combustion engines yields a net-negative GWP of -1.22 kg CO₂-eq per liter, highlighting significant environmental benefits. The process demands 0.029 m³ of water per liter of ethanol and requires approximately 35 acres for the processing plant, with additional land use changes on the farm side.
Integration with a biogas plant enhances circularity by valorizing co-products, reducing waste, and improving resource efficiency. The LCA identifies key improvement areas, such as optimizing water use and minimizing transportation fuel (estimated via a developed methodology), to further lower environmental impacts. The study demonstrates that rice straw-based bioethanol production is environmentally favorable, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and supporting sustainable land use. By leveraging LCA, this process aligns with circular economy goals, offering a scalable model for waste valorization and resource efficiency in biorefining, while providing actionable insights for process optimization and integration with other biochemical systems.
Methodology: The proposed initiative involves a novel anaerobic digestion system optimized for processing mixed waste streams, including sludge and municipal waste. Key innovations include a specialized microbial blend that accelerates the digestion process and an advanced reactor design that maintains ideal environmental conditions for biogas production. The system integrates real-time monitoring and control mechanisms to ensure optimal performance.
Results: Preliminary studies and pilot-scale trials have demonstrated significant improvements in biogas yield and waste reduction efficiency compared to conventional methods. The innovative approach not only increases energy output but also reduces operational costs and environmental impact.
Conclusion: This initiative represents a groundbreaking advancement in waste-to-energy conversion, offering a sustainable and scalable solution for energy production while addressing global waste management challenges. By aligning with the themes of innovation, sustainability, and energy security, this approach is poised to make a substantial contribution to the discussions at the 25th WPC Energy Congress.
Co-author/s:
Mehdi Tanha Ziyarati, Head of Environmental Department, Pars Special Economic Energy Zone, National Iranian Oil Company.
Sakhavat Asadi, CEO, ars Special Economic Energy Zone, National Iranian Oil Company.
Nader Bahramifar, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
Zeinab yaghoobi, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
Hajar Abyar, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
Ali Reza Oveisi, Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lorestan University.
Yerzhan Abylkhanov
Chair
Oil and Gas Production Department Director
KazMunaiGas National Oil & Gas Company
Salisu Isihak
Vice Chair
Senior Business Advisor to the Managing Director
Nigerian National Petroleum Company Ltd.
Xiaoxiao Liu
Vice Chair
Vice Chief Engineer
SINOPEC Economics & Development Research Institute Company Limited
Methodology: The proposed initiative involves a novel anaerobic digestion system optimized for processing mixed waste streams, including sludge and municipal waste. Key innovations include a specialized microbial blend that accelerates the digestion process and an advanced reactor design that maintains ideal environmental conditions for biogas production. The system integrates real-time monitoring and control mechanisms to ensure optimal performance.
Results: Preliminary studies and pilot-scale trials have demonstrated significant improvements in biogas yield and waste reduction efficiency compared to conventional methods. The innovative approach not only increases energy output but also reduces operational costs and environmental impact.
Conclusion: This initiative represents a groundbreaking advancement in waste-to-energy conversion, offering a sustainable and scalable solution for energy production while addressing global waste management challenges. By aligning with the themes of innovation, sustainability, and energy security, this approach is poised to make a substantial contribution to the discussions at the 25th WPC Energy Congress.
Co-author/s:
Mehdi Tanha Ziyarati, Head of Environmental Department, Pars Special Economic Energy Zone, National Iranian Oil Company.
Sakhavat Asadi, CEO, ars Special Economic Energy Zone, National Iranian Oil Company.
Nader Bahramifar, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
Zeinab yaghoobi, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
Hajar Abyar, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
Ali Reza Oveisi, Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lorestan University.
Beyond establishing baseline CI values, this study constructs cargo-level decarbonization cost curves, quantifying the incremental cost (USD/boe) associated with varying levels of decarbonization (up to 100%). Mitigation strategies assessed include flaring reduction, methane management, operational electrification, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). The analysis specifically addresses compatibility with voluntary carbon market (VCM) eligibility criteria, assessing alignment with international standards including ISO 14040/67 [4, 5], and identifies gaps within current VCM protocols. Consequently, best-practice guidelines for conducting petroleum LCAs within a low-carbon trading framework are proposed.
This research aims to provide exporters, buyers, and policymakers with actionable insights into credible low-carbon cargo branding and pricing, particularly in anticipation of European carbon border adjustment mechanisms. By elucidating both carbon intensity metrics and the economic feasibility of decarbonization measures, the findings support the Middle East region's strategic transition toward sustainable export practices and proactive engagement in the global low-carbon energy economy.
References
- Energy Institute. Statistical Review of World Energy 2024.
- El-Houjeiri, H. M., Brandt, A. R., & Duffy, J. E. (2013). Oil Production Greenhouse gas Emissions Estimator (OPGEE): bottom-up LCA tool. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11), 5998-6006.
- Rystad Energy. UCube Database, 2024.
- ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework.
- ISO 14067:2018 - Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products.
Bo Feng
Speaker
Director of Gas Surface Engineering Institute
Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Changqing Oilfield, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)
The analysis first delineates the “well–gathering station–processing plant–pipeline network” system boundary. An LCA model constructed in SimaPro quantifies Global Warming Potential (GWP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential for Elements (ADPE). These metrics are paired with an LCCA-based economic appraisal to devise phase-specific optimisation strategies for construction, operation and decommissioning. An "Environmental-Cost-Technical" multi-objective decision model is then established. Subjective weights are obtained with the Triangular Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TFAHP); objective weights are derived with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method; and composite weights are calculated by minimum-deviation estimation. The Multiple-Attribute Boundary Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method is finally used to rank alternative surface-engineering schemes.
Applying the framework to the Sulige gas field shows that the optimal configuration is “downhole throttling, multi-well manifolding, wet-gas transmission, two-stage compression, centralised processing”. During construction, integrated skid-mounted equipment cuts GWP key-factor emissions by 6.8% and HTP risk by 22.5%; in operation, green-power drives and VOC recovery reduce GWP key-factor emissions by 27.4%, HTP risk by 31.9% and ADPE consumption by 9.5%; at decommissioning, a standard steel-recycling system achieves an 80% steel recovery rate.
By quantifying environmental and economic impacts through coupled LCA-LCCA and embedding them in a fuzzy MCDA framework that addresses life-cycle cost and technical feasibility, this study offers a replicable pathway for the sustainable development of surface facilities in tight gas fields.
Co-author/s:
Ruoqi Tan, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Jiaming Yu, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Guotao Fan, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Rui Zhang, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Zhenfang Xu, Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd, National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
The initial Global Warming Potential (GWP) is calculated at 6.11 kg CO₂-eq per liter of bioethanol, accounting for emissions from agriculture to biorefinery (cradle-to-gate). By applying allocation and system expansion methods, including reductions from avoided farm fires and petrol production displacement, the GWP decreases to 1.59 kg CO₂-eq per liter. Further, substituting bioethanol for petrol in combustion engines yields a net-negative GWP of -1.22 kg CO₂-eq per liter, highlighting significant environmental benefits. The process demands 0.029 m³ of water per liter of ethanol and requires approximately 35 acres for the processing plant, with additional land use changes on the farm side.
Integration with a biogas plant enhances circularity by valorizing co-products, reducing waste, and improving resource efficiency. The LCA identifies key improvement areas, such as optimizing water use and minimizing transportation fuel (estimated via a developed methodology), to further lower environmental impacts. The study demonstrates that rice straw-based bioethanol production is environmentally favorable, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and supporting sustainable land use. By leveraging LCA, this process aligns with circular economy goals, offering a scalable model for waste valorization and resource efficiency in biorefining, while providing actionable insights for process optimization and integration with other biochemical systems.
Geetali Kalita
Speaker
Deputy General Manager and Head-ESG
M/s Numaligarh Refinery Limited
CORSIA specifies that SAF must deliver a minimum 10% net reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions relative to the baseline fossil jet fuel benchmark of 89 gCO₂e/MJ. Additionally, eligible feedstocks must meet stringent criteria related to land use, water and soil health, biodiversity conservation, human rights, and waste management. A key differentiator is the indirect land-use change (ILUC) risk, which assigns higher penalties to crop-based feedstocks like CPO and zero penalties to waste or residue-based alternatives such as Used Cooking Oil (UCO) and Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME).
The analysis compares CPO, UCO, and POME across life-cycle emissions and policy acceptance. UCO and POME, classified as waste/by-product streams, achieve significant GHG reductions—over 80%—and are free from ILUC implications, making them highly compatible with CORSIA and other international sustainability frameworks. In contrast, CPO-based SAF presents substantial challenges. Even with advanced biogas capture during processing (>85%), CPO achieves only marginal GHG savings (~14%). Without such mitigation, it fails to meet the minimum emissions threshold, disqualifying it under most standards.
These sustainability limitations are echoed in global policy frameworks. The European Union’s ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation and the United Kingdom’s SAF Mandate explicitly exclude CPO due to its high ILUC risk, while promoting UCO and POME as preferred feedstocks. Similarly, under the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and Clean Fuel Production Credit (CFPC) scheme, CPO is effectively ineligible, whereas UCO and POME qualify for financial incentives and SAF certification pathways.
This evaluation highlights that SAF derived from CPO is largely misaligned with international sustainability and regulatory expectations. The findings underscore that future SAF production strategies—particularly those seeking global recognition and market access—must prioritize waste and residue-based feedstocks such as UCO and POME over primary crop-based oils like CPO. For NRL’s proposed facility, aligning with such criteria will be critical to achieving CORSIA certification and international competitiveness in the growing SAF market.
Wenjia Xu
Speaker
Senior Engineer
CNPC Research Institute of Safety & Environment Technology
Co-author/s:
Wei Fan, Senior Engineer, CNPC Research Institute of Safety& Environment Technology.
Xu Zhang, Senior Engineer, CNPC Research Institute of Safety& Environment Technology.
Kurmanbek Yeshmagambetov
Speaker
Head of Standarts and Innovation Department at KazTransOil JSC, R&D Branch
KazTransOil JSC
Through a mixed-methods approach—including case studies, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis—the research identifies systemic inefficiencies in current waste management systems. For instance, BRICS nations exhibit alarmingly low recycling rates (e.g., 1–8% for construction waste), with most materials ending up in landfills or illegally dumped. Challenges such as inadequate regulatory frameworks, outdated technologies, and fragmented stakeholder collaboration hinder progress toward circularity. The paper proposes a Circular Economy Process Model (CEPM) tailored to oil and gas construction, emphasizing lifecycle integration, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive policies. Key strategies include adopting modular design, promoting recycled materials in infrastructure, incentivizing waste-to-energy technologies, and strengthening institutional frameworks for waste valorization.
Theoretical contributions highlight the integration of systems theory, life cycle assessment (LCA), and industrial ecology to reframe construction practices. Practically, the study offers actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, such as implementing circular procurement policies, advancing digital tools for waste tracking, and fostering cross-sector partnerships. Future applications of the CEPM could extend to other resource-intensive industries, supporting global sustainability goals.
By bridging the gap between developed and emerging economies, this research underscores the urgency of transitioning to circular practices in oil and gas construction. It provides a roadmap for reducing environmental footprints, optimizing resource use, and aligning the sector with international sustainability targets, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ultimately, the study advocates for systemic innovation, policy coherence, and stakeholder-driven governance to achieve a resilient, low-carbon, and circular construction ecosystem in emerging markets.
Keywords: Circular economy; Construction waste management; Oil and gas projects; Sustainability; BRICS nations; Lifecycle assessment; Policy innovation.


